(Buzzle.com)
Out of all the previous blog post's relationships, I believe
the most exciting (and probably least thought about) has been saved for last!
Just as all our previous discussions, plant's relationship with soil is much
deeper than just a place for it to grow. The average person sees soil as just
'dirt,' but it is so much more than that. Soil is home to billions upon
billions of microscopic bacteria and fungi all that interact with plants in
different ways. Soil is formed through a
combination of topography, parent material, climate, biota, and time. There are thousands of unique soil types that
result from varying combinations of these five factors. Soil is really the
basis of all other life in an ecosystem.
The type of soil affects the plant communities that are able to survive
and thrive at a certain location. There cannot be plants, or animals, or
anything living for that matter without 'dirt!' So how does fire affect this
incredible relationship between soil and plants?
In the
plant-environment blog post, we scratched the surface on this topic. Often,
especially after a high intensity wildlife, many of the nutrients are stripped
away from the top of the soil. Also, soil pH levels increase and mineral
elements move to the ash layer. The newly bare soil deprived of plants that used to reside there, can lead to lots
of runoff and erosion; however, this is not always a negative thing and can
actually often redistribute the soil nutrients. Another major change to soil following a fire is water
filtration rate. With plants, soil absorbs water pretty rapidly, but after a
fire the soil can become "water-repellent." Evapotranspiration
is normally a large loss of water from the hydrologic cycle. With
fire removing many woody plants from the landscape and replacing them with
grasses and herbaceous plants, loss of water from evapotranspiration is greatly
decreased. Both lower evapotranspiration and lower rates of infiltration
lead to increase stream flow as well as soil water storage. So while less water
can enter the soil, less water is also leaving it. In the short-term fire may
negatively effect soil, but nature has some pretty incredible ways of fixing
itself.
Now
let's dive in a little deeper. What is fire's effect on soil microbe and fungal
communities? Just as every other topic, the intensity of the fire really
affects the answer to that question. In one study in the southeast, frequent
prescribed fire's effect on the soil fungal communities was examined in
comparison to unburned sites. (Remember that prescribed fires are normally very
low intensity.) The results of the study indicated no significant changes in
both richness and diversity, although often there is a shift in species found
(Oliver et al. 2015). This may indicate
that certain fungal communities may actually support plant communities
that are composed of desired fire adapted or fire tolerant species that
dominate the frequently burned areas (Oliver et al. 2015). A table below displays the lack of much change in richness, diversity, or evenness from the Oliver study.
This indicates that the argument many people often make that regular burning is
ruining the soil is very far from being the truth. Again looking at prescribed
fire's effect on fungal communities, but this time across the ocean in the
Mediterranean, species richness was observed. Unlike the southeast study, the
Rincon study showed a decrease in species richness, but a high ratio of Tuberaceae and Pezizales (Rincon
et al. 2013). This still supports the idea of the potential for fire-adapted
fungi in fire adapted communities, especially pine communities due to their
high reliance on ectomyorrhizal fungal symbiosis.
High
intensity fires have a very different outcome on soil microbial and fungal
communities. In a study observing soil carbon and microbial biomass in boreal
forests following wildfires, there was a total reduction of 52-56% in soil
microbial biomass (Holden et al. 2016). In addition, mycorrhizal taxa
and basidiomycetes showed incredibly low tolerances for high intensity fires
(Holden et al. 2016). This decrease in
biomass from unburned to burned sites can be seen in the figure below from Holden's study.
An earlier study from 2013, also compared burned and unburned
sites while observing soil fungi communities, but this time in the Mountain
Chaco Forest. This study noted the direct relationship between fire and decline
in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (Longo et al. 2013). The decline was in
both richness and diversity, the complete opposite of low intensity fires.
However, just as stated before nature has incredible ways of fixing
itself. Another study also looked at arbuscular
mycorrhizal fungi post wildfires, but on a long-term scale. They also noted a
severe decline in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi a year after the fire, but 11
years later the community was reestablished (Xiang et al. 2015). A study in Texas, I believe summarized all
the findings in a single study comparing unburned, prescribed burned, and
wildfire sites in the Southwest. They
noted that there was a reduced soil microbial biomass and enzyme activity
following fire, but the prescribed fire sites did not have long term effects
(Fultz et al. 2015).
Plant
communities might also have a strong effect on fire's affect on soil
communities. Varying plant species have
different levels of flammability and heat, which affects the intensity of a
fire. For example, soil communities were more negatively affected following a
fire under pines than kermes oaks (Barcenas-Moreno et al. 2014). This highlights the importance of vegetation
as a fresh organic source in soil ecosystems (Barcenas-Moreno et al.
2014). This can be important in creating
"refuge patches" for soil microbes. Soil fungal communities can
reestablish faster, even after a high intensity fire, as long as there are
patches of low intensity fires throughout where the fungi can survive (Cowan
2015).
Fire is an
unstoppable part of nature. We as people may try to suppress it, but eventually
fire adapted ecosystems will burn. After years of suppression, these fires are
high intensity, and as seen by studies in this and previous blog posts, the
results can be catastrophic to ecosystems that take many many years to 'fix.'
Hopefully now you can at least begin see some of the positives of fire,
especially prescribed burns, and the value they can serve to the environment as
well as preventing catastrophic wildfires.
Literature Cited
Bárcenas-Moreno,
G., García-Orenes, F., Mataix-Beneyto, J., & Bååth, E. (2014). Plant
species influence on soil microbial short-term response after fire simulation. Plant
and soil, 374(1-2), 701-713. https://www.infona.pl/resource/bwmeta1.element.springer-6521758a-10c8-3d90-affb-4aa7fcbbdf56
Certini,
G. (2005). Effects of fire on properties of forest soils: a review. Oecologia,
143(1), 1-10.
http://www.fsl.orst.edu/ltep/Biscuit/Biscuit_files/Refs/Certini%20Oa%202005%20fire.pdf
Cowan,
A. D., Smith, J. E., & Fitzgerald, S. A. (2016). Recovering lost ground:
effects of soil burn intensity on nutrients and ectomycorrhiza communities of
ponderosa pine seedlings. Forest Ecology and Management, 378,
160-172. http://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/1957/56543/CowanArielD2015.pdf?sequence=1
Fultz,
L. M., Moore-Kucera, J., Dathe, J., Davinic, M., Perry, G., Wester, D., ...
& Rideout-Hanzak, S. (2016). Forest wildfire and grassland prescribed fire
effects on soil biogeochemical processes and microbial communities: Two case
studies in the semi-arid Southwest. Applied Soil Ecology, 99,
118-128. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Sandra_Rideout-Hanzak/publication/285359708_Forest_wildfire_and_grassland_prescribed_fire_effects_on_soil_biogeochemical_processes_and_microbial_communities_Two_case_studies_in_the_semi-arid_Southwest/links/5695177508ae3ad8e33d4a30.pdf
Graham,
R. C., Egerton-Warburton, L. M., Hendrix, P. F., Shouse, P. J.,
Johnson-Maynard, J. L., Quideau, S. A., ... & Breiner, J. M. (2016).
Wildfire Effects on Soils of a 55-Year-Old Chaparral and Pine Biosequence. Soil
Science Society of America Journal, 80(2), 376-394. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Sylvie_Quideau/publication/300081346_Wildfire_Effects_on_Soils_of_a_55-Year-Old_Chaparral_and_Pine_Biosequence/links/5765b33108ae421c4489d48c.pdf
Holden,
S. R., Gutierrez, A., & Treseder, K. K. (2013). Changes in soil fungal
communities, extracellular enzyme activities, and litter decomposition across a
fire chronosequence in Alaskan boreal forests. Ecosystems, 16(1),
34-46. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Kathleen_Treseder/publication/257469632_Changes_in_Soil_Fungal_Communities_Extracellular_Enzyme_Activities_and_Litter_Decomposition_Across_a_Fire_Chronosequence_in_Alaskan_Boreal_Forests/links/56aed65008aeaa696f2ed73b.pdf
Holden,
S. R., Rogers, B. M., Treseder, K. K., & Randerson, J. T. (2016). Fire
severity influences the response of soil microbes to a boreal forest fire. Environmental
Research Letters, 11(3), 035004. http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/11/3/035004/meta
Longo,
S., Nouhra, E., Goto, B. T., Berbara, R. L., & Urcelay, C. (2014). Effects
of fire on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in the Mountain Chaco Forest. Forest
Ecology and Management, 315, 86-94. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Carlos_Urcelay/publication/260006674_Effects_of_fire_on_arbuscular_mycorrhizal_fungi_in_the_Mountain_Chaco_Forest/links/0046352f8cfab6163c000000.pdf
Oliver,
A. K., Callaham, M. A., & Jumpponen, A. (2015). Soil fungal communities
respond compositionally to recurring frequent prescribed burning in a managed
southeastern US forest ecosystem. Forest Ecology and Management, 345,
1-9. https://www.srs.fs.usda.gov/pubs/ja/2015/ja_2015_callaham_002.pdf
Reazin,
C., Morris, S., Smith, J. E., Cowan, A. D., & Jumpponen, A. (2016). Fires
of differing intensities rapidly select distinct soil fungal communities in a
Northwest US ponderosa pine forest ecosystem. Forest Ecology and Management,
377, 118-127. https://www.fs.fed.us/pnw/pubs/journals/pnw_2016_reazin001.pdf
Rincón,
A., Santamaría, B. P., Ocaña, L., & Verdú, M. (2014). Structure and
phylogenetic diversity of post-fire ectomycorrhizal communities of maritime
pine. Mycorrhiza, 24(2), 131-141. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ana_Rincon/publication/255975104_Structure_and_phylogenetic_diversity_of_post-fire_ectomycorrhizal_communities_of_maritime_pine/links/561e59f208aecade1acbf154.pdf
Xiang,
X., Gibbons, S. M., Yang, J., Kong, J., Sun, R., & Chu, H. (2015).
Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities show low resistance and high
resilience to wildfire disturbance. Plant and soil, 397(1-2),
347-356. https://www.infona.pl/resource/bwmeta1.element.springer-doi-10_1007-S11104-015-2633-Z



Excellent post! I've learned a lot from your blog and have appreciated your perspective in class this spring! Good luck with the new job!
ReplyDelete